Limits of harmonisation and convergence. dissimilarities within similarities of polish and german contract law (Wolters Kluwer Polska SA)

Tytuł Limits of Harmonisation and Convergence. Dissimilarities within Similarities of Polish and German Contract Law Autorzy Monika Jagielska, Ewa Rott-Pietrzyk, Fryderyk Zoll, Grzegorz Żmij, Elwira Macierzyńska-Franaszczyk Język polski Wydawnictwo Wolters Kluwer Polska SA ISBN 978-83-8124-614-9 kolekcja Monografie Rok wydania 2018 liczba stron 432 Format pdf Spis treści Project Contributors | str. 15

List of Abbreviations | str. 19

Bibliography | str. 23

Introduction | str. 39

Chapter I
Sales

§ 1. Seller's representation and liability under warranty or other grounds | str. 75
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 31.01.1962 - VIII ZR 120/60) and German law | str. 75
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 78
1. Interpretation of the assurance of a thing's properties within the meaning of the provisions of warranty for physical defects of the thing | str. 78
2. The relation between the warranty regime and the contractual liability according to general rules | str. 80
3. The relation between the warranty regime and error provisions | str. 81

§ 2. Seller's assurance regarding a thing's properties | str. 85
I. Identification of the case-problem (OLG Düsseldorf verdict of 28.04.2008 - 1 U 273/07) and German law | str. 85
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 88
1. Seller's assurance of a thing's properties and failure to comply with such assurance as the defect of the thing | str. 88
2. Relation between the seller's assurance and the general clause on a thing's non-compliance with the agreement | str. 91
3. Insignificance of a physical defect and the possibility of terminating the agreement | str. 92
4. Objective or subjective assessment of the significance of the defect | str. 94

§ 3. Passing of risk and liability under warranty | str. 95
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 14.06.1972 - VIII ZR 75/71) and German law | str. 95
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 98
1. What does it mean that a defect must exist at the time of passing of risk? | str. 98
2. Impossibility of selling a thing as the thing's physical defect | str. 100

§ 4. Customary properties of a thing | str. 101
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 04.03.2009 - VIII ZR 160/08) and German law | str. 101
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 103
1. Interpretation of "the notion of things of the same kind" for the purpose of the warranty regulation | str. 103
2. The thing's defectiveness due to the lack of suitability for customary use | str. 104

§ 5. Properties of a second-hand thing | str. 106
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 20.05.2009 - VIII ZR 191/07) and German law | str. 106
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 109
1. Obligations of the seller of second-hand cars with respect to the warranty for a thing's physical defects | str. 109
2. Diminishing of a thing's value, which does not influence its functionality, as the thing's physical defect | str. 111

§ 6. Seller's assurance of the properties of a second-hand thing | str. 113
I. Identification of the case-problem (OLG Coblence verdict of 01.04.2004 - 5 U 1385/03) and German law | str. 113
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 115

§ 7. Legal defects of the sold goods | str. 117
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 31.01.1990 - VIII ZR 314/88) and German law | str. 117
1. Differentiation of a legal defect żeby selling an object and legal defects by selling a right | str. 119
2. Knowledge about a legal defect | str. 120
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 122
1. Regulation on warranty for legal defects in German law | str. 122
2. Regulation on warranty for legal defects in Polish law | str. 126
3. Legal defects and their features | str. 133

§ 8. Breach of quality specifications under a contract of sales | str. 147
I. Identification of the case-problem (OLG Frankfurt verdict of 28.03.2007 - 19 U 235/06) and German law | str. 147
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 150
1. Qualifying delivery of an aliud as non-performance of an obligation, ruled aby Article 471 PCC - contractual liability regime (ex contractu) | str. 152
2. Qualifying the delivery of aliud as the sale of a defective good under Article 556 PCC | str. 162
3. Concurrence of provisions | str. 166
III. Resolving the German case under the CESL | str. 168
IV. Resolving the German case under the CISG | str. 170

§ 9. Burden of proving the material defect of the goods sold | str. 177
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 02.06.2004 - VIII ZR 329/03) and German law | str. 177
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 179
III. Resolving the German case under the CESL | str. 184
IV. Resolving the German case under the CISG | str. 186

§ 10. Price reduction, exchange or repair of a defective good | str. 189
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 09.01.2008 - VIII ZR 210/06) and German law | str. 189
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 192
1. Is the good sold defective or not? | str. 192
2. What is the impact of a fraudulently concealed defect in the contract? | str. 195
3. Is the buyer entitled to ask for a price reduction or the termination of the contract without giving the seller time to cure the defect? | str. 196
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 198

§ 11. Standards of performing warranty rights by the buyer | str. 200
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 23.01.2008 - VIII ZR 246/06) and German law | str. 200
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 201
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 203

§ 12. The right to terminate a contract in case of repair of defective goods | str. 205
I. Identification of the case-problem (OLG Saarbrücken verdict of 29.05.2008 - 8 U 494/07) and German law | str. 205
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 207
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 210

§ 13. Demanding delivery of a new thing | str. 211
I. Identification of the case-problem (OLG Braunschweig verdict of 04.02.2003 - 8 W 83/02) and German law | str. 211
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 212
1. Demand for the delivery of a new car | str. 212
2. Estimation of the costs | str. 213
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 213

§ 14. Replacement of installed defective consumer goods | str. 215
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 21.12.2011 - VIII ZR 70/08) and German law | str. 215
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 217
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 217

§ 15. Termination of a contract due to defects of the sold good | str. 218
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 22.06.2005 - VIII ZR 1/05) and German law | str. 218
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 220
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 222

§ 16. Insignificant defect in a sold good and the right to terminate the contract | str. 223
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 24.03.2006 - V ZR 173/05) and German law | str. 223
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 224
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 225

§ 17. Assessing insignificance of defects of the sold good | str. 226
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 05.11.2008 - VIII ZR 166/07) and German law | str. 226
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 228
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 228

§ 18. Claim for damages resulting from the termination of a contract | str. 229
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 20.07.2005 - VIII ZR 275/04) and German law | str. 230
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 235

§ 19. Prerequisites for the awareness of legal defects | str. 241
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 20.12.1978 - VIII ZR 114/77) and German law | str. 241
1. Liability for the legal defect on comparative grounds - the "moment of awareness" | str. 244
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 248
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG | str. 252
1. Applicability of Article 42 CISG | str. 259

§ 20. Exclusion of the warranty - new defects after the conclusion of a contract | str. 263
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 24.01.2003 - V ZR 248/02) and German law | str. 263
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 264
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 267

§ 21. Liability under implied warranty for physical defects that existed before transferring the risk | str. 269
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 10.03.1995 - V ZR 7/94) and German law | str. 269
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 271
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 274

§ 22. Avoidance of a contract of sale of real estate because of a mistake | str. 275
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 14.12.1960 - V ZR 40/60) and German law | str. 275
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 277
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 280

§ 23. Mistake in the authorship of a sold painting | str. 283
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 08.06.1988 - VIII ZR 135/87) and German law | str. 283
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 285
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 288

§ 24. No withdrawal of an offer at auction on the Internet | str. 292
I. Identification of the case-problem (OLG Oldenburg verdict of 18.07.2005 - 8 U 93/05) and German law | str. 292
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 293
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 296

§ 25. Substitute performance aby the sale of goods in specie | str. 297
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 07.06.2006 - VIII ZR 209/05) and German law | str. 297
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 298
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 300

§ 26. Withdrawal from a sale contract under provisions relating to culpa in contrahendo | str. 301
I. Identification of the case-problem (OLG Hamm verdict of 13.05.2003 - 28 U 150/02) and German law | str. 301
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 302
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 305

§ 27. Terms and conditions of sale between building market wholesalers and suppliers (development of the provisions of limitation) | str. 307
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 05.10.2005 - VIII ZR 16/05) and German law | str. 307
II. Consideration of the problems presented in the German case and their comparison with Polish law | str. 309
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 311

Chapter II
Contract of work

§ 28. Customer's acceptance or renouncement of the work and the contractor's remuneration | str. 315
I. Identification of the case-problem (OLG Köln verdict of 17.03.2003 - 19 U 97/02) and German law | str. 315
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 316

§ 29. Contractor's remuneration in the event of damage to the work due to the customer | str. 321
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 11.07.1963 - VII ZR 43/62) and German law | str. 321
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 323

§ 30. Impaired utility of the work due to improper performance | str. 328
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 09.01.2003 - VII ZR 181/00) and German law | str. 328
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 330

Chapter III
Donation

§ 31. Legal nature of donation as gratuitous contract | str. 337
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 28.05.2009 - Xa ZR 9/08) and German law | str. 337
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 340

§ 32. Between a loan and a donation - dilemmas over classification | str. 355
I. Identification of the case-problem (OLG Stuttgart verdict of 21.03.1986 - 2 U 181/85) and German law | str. 355
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 358

Chapter IV
Remedies

§ 33. Compensation for defect-related damages not depending on the prerequisites of default | str. 379
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 19.06.2009 - V ZR 93/08) and German law | str. 380
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 381
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 383

§ 34. Requirements for an assurance of authenticity in the trade of artwork (Edward Burra) | str. 385
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 15.02.1995 - VIII ZR 126/94) and German law | str. 385
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 387
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 392

§ 35. Time and limitation period for a disproportionality defence | str. 393
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 28.11.2007 - VIII ZR 16/07) and German law | str. 393
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 394
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 397

§ 36. Time and substantial limits for the defence of disproportionality | str. 398
I. Identification of the case-problem (OLG Celle verdict of 28.06.2006 - 7 U 235/05) and German law | str. 398
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 400
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 403

§ 37. Recovery of costs for legal services | str. 404
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 29.11.2006 - VIII ZR 92/06) and German law | str. 404
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 405
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 406

Chapter V
Contract terms

§ 38. Exclusion of liability in the general terms and conditions | str. 409
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 10.10.1977 - VIII ZR 110/76) and German law | str. 409
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 411
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 416

§ 39. Notarial deed used three times as a kanon contract | str. 417
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 27.09.2001 - VII ZR 388/00) and German law | str. 417
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 418
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 422

§ 40. Mistakes in the product catalogue | str. 424
I. Identification of the case-problem (BGH verdict of 04.02.2009 - VIII ZR 32/08) and German law | str. 424
II. Consideration of the problem presented in the German case and its comparison with Polish law | str. 426
III. Resolving the German case under the CISG and CESL | str. 428